*Built using Zelig version 5.1.2.9000*

Normal Regression for Continuous Dependent Variables with `normal`

.

The Normal regression model is a close variant of the more standard least squares regression model. Both models specify a continuous dependent variable as a linear function of a set of explanatory variables. The Normal model reports maximum likelihood (rather than least squares) estimates. The two models differ only in their estimate for the stochastic parameter \(\sigma\).

Attach sample data:

`data(macro)`

Estimate model:

```
z.out1 <- zelig(unem ~ gdp + capmob + trade, model = "normal",
data = macro)
```

```
## How to cite this model in Zelig:
## R Core Team. 2008.
## normal: Normal Regression for Continuous Dependent Variables
## in Christine Choirat, Christopher Gandrud, James Honaker, Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Olivia Lau,
## "Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software," http://zeligproject.org/
```

Summarize of regression coefficients:

`summary(z.out1)`

```
## Model:
##
## Call:
## z5$zelig(formula = unem ~ gdp + capmob + trade, data = macro)
##
## Deviance Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -5.3008 -2.0768 -0.3187 1.9789 7.7715
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 6.181294 0.450572 13.719 < 2e-16
## gdp -0.323601 0.062820 -5.151 4.36e-07
## capmob 1.421939 0.166443 8.543 4.22e-16
## trade 0.019854 0.005606 3.542 0.000452
##
## (Dispersion parameter for gaussian family taken to be 7.54307)
##
## Null deviance: 3664.8 on 349 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 2609.9 on 346 degrees of freedom
## AIC: 1706.5
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2
##
## Next step: Use 'setx' method
```

Set explanatory variables to their default (mean/mode) values, with high (80th percentile) and low (20th percentile) values for trade:

```
x.high <- setx(z.out1, trade = quantile(macro$trade, 0.8))
x.low <- setx(z.out1, trade = quantile(macro$trade, 0.2))
```

Generate first differences for the effect of high versus low trade on GDP:

`s.out1 <- sim(z.out1, x = x.high, x1 = x.low)`

`summary(s.out1)`

```
##
## sim x :
## -----
## ev
## mean sd 50% 2.5% 97.5%
## [1,] 5.439167 0.1843065 5.44302 5.074196 5.781827
## pv
## mean sd 50% 2.5% 97.5%
## [1,] 5.463443 2.713865 5.41136 0.4059531 10.85049
##
## sim x1 :
## -----
## ev
## mean sd 50% 2.5% 97.5%
## [1,] 4.609335 0.1795533 4.607639 4.261402 4.971085
## pv
## mean sd 50% 2.5% 97.5%
## [1,] 4.767879 2.662139 4.764892 -0.447583 10.00484
## fd
## mean sd 50% 2.5% 97.5%
## [1,] -0.8298316 0.2320023 -0.8266661 -1.299632 -0.3615469
```

A visual summary of quantities of interest:

`plot(s.out1)`

Let \(Y_i\) be the continuous dependent variable for observation \(i\).

- The
*stochastic component*is described by a univariate normal model with a vector of means \(\mu_i\) and scalar variance \(\sigma^2\):

\[ Y_i \; \sim \; \textrm{Normal}(\mu_i, \sigma^2). \]

- The
*systematic component*is

\[ \mu_i \;= \; x_i \beta, \]

where \(x_i\) is the vector of \(k\) explanatory variables and \(\beta\) is the vector of coefficients.

- The expected value (qi$ev) is the mean of simulations from the the stochastic component,

\[ E(Y) = \mu_i = x_i \beta, \]

given a draw of \(\beta\) from its posterior.

The predicted value (qi$pr) is drawn from the distribution defined by the set of parameters \((\mu_i, \sigma)\).

The first difference (qi$fd) is:

\[ \textrm{FD}\; = \;E(Y \mid x_1) - E(Y \mid x) \]

- In conditional prediction models, the average expected treatment effect (att.ev) for the treatment group is

\[ \frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^n t_i}\sum_{i:t_i=1}^n \left\{ Y_i(t_i=1) - E[Y_i(t_i=0)] \right\}, \]

where \(t_i\) is a binary explanatory variable defining the treatment (\(t_i=1\)) and control (\(t_i=0\)) groups. Variation in the simulations are due to uncertainty in simulating \(E[Y_i(t_i=0)]\), the counterfactual expected value of \(Y_i\) for observations in the treatment group, under the assumption that everything stays the same except that the treatment indicator is switched to \(t_i=0\).

- In conditional prediction models, the average predicted treatment effect (att.pr) for the treatment group is

\[ \frac{1}{\sum_{i=1}^n t_i}\sum_{i:t_i=1}^n \left\{ Y_i(t_i=1) - \widehat{Y_i(t_i=0)} \right\}, \]

where \(t_i\) is a binary explanatory variable defining the treatment (\(t_i=1\)) and control (\(t_i=0\)) groups. Variation in the simulations are due to uncertainty in simulating \(\widehat{Y_i(t_i=0)}\), the counterfactual predicted value of \(Y_i\) for observations in the treatment group, under the assumption that everything stays the same except that the treatment indicator is switched to \(t_i=0\).

The Zelig object stores fields containing everything needed to rerun the Zelig output, and all the results and simulations as they are generated. In addition to the summary commands demonstrated above, some simply utility functions (known as *getters*) provide easy access to the raw fields most commonly of use for further investigation.

If the `zelig()`

call output object is `z.out`

, then `coef(z.out)`

returns the estimated coefficients, `vcov(z.out)`

returns the estimated covariance matrix, and `predict(z.out)`

provides predicted values for all observations in the dataset from the analysis.

The normal model is part of the stats package by the R Core Team. Advanced users may wish to refer to `help(glm)`

and `help(family)`

.

R Core Team (2017). *R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing*. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <URL: https://www.R-project.org/>.